Comparison of Bamboo and Wire Types of Battery Materials on the Welfare and Production Performance of Laying Hen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62793/japsi.v1i2.14Keywords:
bamboo battery, poultry welfare, production performance, wire batteryAbstract
This research aimed to determine the comparison of types of battery materials for laying hens, specifically bamboo and wire, on the welfare and production performance of laying hens. The material for this research consisted of 100 laying hens of the ISA Brown strain aged 54 weeks. The variables observed included livestock welfare, which was assessed through behavioral aspects (eating, drinking, and resting), while the production performance variables observed included HDP (Hen Day Production), egg weight, egg mass, and FCR (Feed Conversion Ratio). The research method employed an experimental approach using the T-test (independent sample). Two treatments were used, each with 50 replications. The results of the research indicated that the difference in treatment using T1 (bamboo battery materials) and T2 (wire battery materials) affected livestock welfare and production performance. The research results demonstrated that the behavior of bamboo batteries was considered better in terms of livestock welfare because they were able to better prevent heat stress. In terms of production performance, wire batteries exhibited higher Hen Day Production (HDP) and were better at preventing disease than bamboo batteries. However, bamboo batteries had a higher egg weight due to the frequency of feeding chickens being higher than wire batteries. Improved sanitation management is necessary for batteries made from bamboo because they tend to more easily become a medium for the growth of germs, lice, and fungi, which can cause disease and result in decreased production performance.
References
Adriant, Z., Yulianto, Forster, R., & Zariatin, D. L. (2019). The Effect Of Mesh Size On Mechanical And Thermal Properties Of Bamboo Composites. Journal of Energy, Mechanical, Material, and Manufacturing Engineering, 10(20).
Agustina, I., & Astuti, D. (2015). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF) Ke-6 2015 Penentuan Konduktivitas Termal Logam Tembaga, Kuningan, dan Besi dengan Metode Gandengan. FKIP UNS Journal Systems, 6(1).
Anderson, K. E., Davis, G. S., Jenkins, P. K., & Carroll, A. S. (2004). Effects of bird age, density, and molt on behavioral profiles of two commercial layer strains in cages. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.1.15
Appleby, M. C. (1998). Modification of Laying Hen Cages to Improve Behavior. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1828
Barrow, P., Nair, V., Baigent, S., Atterbury, R., & Clark, M. (2021). Poultry Health: A Guide for Professionals. In Poultry Health: A Guide for Professionals. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789245042.0000
Dameanti, F. N. A. E. P., Firdaus, M. A., Titisari, N., Aditya, S., & Guritno, I. (2020). Pengaruh Faktor Lingkungan terhadap Produktivitas Telur Ayam Kampung Unggulan Balitbangtan (KUB) Fase Layer. Jurnal Medik Veteriner. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmv.vol3.iss2.2020.166-172
de Reu, K., Rodenburg, T. B., Grijspeerdt, K., Messens, W., Heyndrickx, M., Tuyttens, F. A. M., Sonck, B., Zoons, J., & Herman, L. (2009). Bacteriological contamination, dirt, and cracks of eggshells in furnished cages and noncage systems for laying hens: An international on-farm comparison. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00097
Dewi, K. M., Rochdiani, D., & Sudrajat, S.-. (2023). STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN AYAM RAS PETELUR DI DESA CIBATU KECAMATAN KARANGNUNGGAL. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa AGROINFO GALUH, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v10i1.9053
Dively, G. P., Patton, T., Barranco, L., & Kulhanek, K. (2020). Comparative efficacy of common active ingredients in organic insecticides against difficult to control insect pests. Insects, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090614
Fadhlurrohman, R., Suarman, D. F., & ... (2021). Pengaruh Faktor Lingkungan Terhadap Reproduksi Ayam Ras Petelur. Prosiding ….
Fahim, M., Haris, M., Khan, W., & Zaman, S. (2022). Bamboo as a Construction Material: Prospects and Challenges. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/149737
Felver-Gant, J. N., Mack, L. A., Dennis, R. L., Eicher, S. D., & Cheng, H. W. (2012). Genetic variations alter physiological responses following heat stress in 2 strains of laying hens. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01988
Flachowsky, G. (1997). Basic animal nutrition and feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-8401(97)84958-9
Gerber, N. (2005). Factors affecting egg quality in the commercial laying hen : a review. Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand Inc., 1–28.
Hasan, M. M., Talukder, S., Mandal, A. K., Tasmim, S. T., Parvin, M. S., Ali, M. Y., Sikder, M. H., & Islam, M. T. (2020). Prevalence and risk factors of Campylobacter infection in broiler and cockerel flocks in Mymensingh and Gazipur districts of Bangladesh. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105034
Hinz, T., & Linke, S. (1998). A comprehensive experimental study of aerial pollutants in and emissions from livestock buildings. Part 2: Results. Journal of Agricultural and Engineering Research, 70(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0282
Hyline International. (2016). Hy-Line Brown commercial layers managmenet guide. Hy-Line Brown Commercial Layers Management Guide.
Kleyn. (2013). Chicken Nutrition. A guide for nutritionists and poultry professionals. Book.
ManageMent guide Alternative production systems 2. (n.d.).
Merdana, I. M., Suada, I. K., Robi, I. M., & Sadhi, I. D. M. N. (2022). Total Bakteri dan Coliform Limbah Tempat Pemotongan Ayam Tradisional Setelah Perlakuan Serbuk Biji Kelor. Buletin Veteriner Udayana. https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2022.v14.i05.p04
Muharlien, M., Sudjarwo, E., Lestari Yulianti, D., & Setyo Prayogi, H. (2020). Evaluation of booster additive with different DOC body weight on Broiler production performance in closed house. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 30(3), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2020.030.03.11
NUGROHO, Y. A., & WALUYO, W. (2021). Investigasi Sagging Metoda Parabola pada Saluran Transmisi Terhadap Parameter Temperatur pada Saluran 150 Kv pada Gardu Induk Cigereleng. MIND Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.26760/mindjournal.v6i1.46-56
Olgun, M., Çelik, M. Y., & Polat, H. E. (2007). Determining of heat balance design criteria for laying hen houses under continental climate conditions. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.002
Perić, L., Đukić Stojčić, M., & Bjedov, S. (2016). Effect of Production Systems on Quality and Chemical Composition of Table Eggs. Contemporary Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1515/contagri-2016-0014
Ph, J. J., & Note, K. (2023). Cleaning and Disinfecting in Organic Poultry Production. 603(1), 603–606.
Pohle, K., & Cheng, H. W. (2009). Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science, 88(10). https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00171
Prasetyo, A. K., Anggriawan, R., & Afikasari, D. (2022). PENGARUH PEMBERIAN ASAM SITRAT (CITRIC ACID) SEBAGAI FEED ADDITIVE TERHADAP FCR (FEED CONVERTION RATIO) DAN HDP (HEN DAY PRODUCTION) AYAM PETELUR DI KECAMATAN BADAS KABUPATEN KEDIRI. Jurnal Agriovet, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51158/agriovet.v5i1.792
Setiawati, T., Afnan, R., & Ulupi, N. (2016a). Performa Produksi dan Kualitas Telur Ayam Petelur pada Sistem Litter dan Cage dengan Suhu Kandang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi Dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan. https://doi.org/10.29244/4.1.197-203
Setiawati, T., Afnan, R., & Ulupi, N. (2016b). Performa Produksi dan Kualitas Telur Ayam Petelur pada Sistem Litter dan Cage dengan Suhu Kandang Berbeda Productive Performance and Egg Quality of Layer in Litter and Cage System with Different Temperatures. Januari, 04(1), 197–203.
Sharma, M. K., McDaniel, C. D., Kiess, A. S., Loar, R. E., & Adhikari, P. (2022). Effect of housing environment and hen strain on egg production and egg quality as well as cloacal and eggshell microbiology in laying hens. Poultry Science, 101(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101595
Sibbald, I. R., & Slinger, S. J. (1963). Factors Affecting the Metabolizable Energy Content of Poultry Feeds. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0420137
Sudjarwo, E., Muharlien, M., Sjofjan, O., & Yulianti, D. L. (2022). Production Performance of Layer Strain Hy-Line Brown in Different Cage Locations in Closed House. E3S Web of Conferences, 335. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202233500018
Tamzil, M. H. (2014). Heat Stress on Poultry: Metabolism, Effects and Efforts to Overcome. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v24i2.1049
Utomo, D. M. (2018). PERFORMA AYAM RAS PETELUR COKLAT DENGAN FREKUENSI PEMBERIAN RANSUM YANG BERBEDA. AVES: Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.35457/aves.v11i2.276
Van Den Brand, H., Parmentier, H. K., & Kemp, B. (2004). Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. British Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400014283
Vilariño, M., Picard, M. L., Melcion, J. P., & Faure, J. M. (1996). Behavioural adaptation of laying hens to dilution of diets under mash and pellet form. British Poultry Science, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417921
Wiguna, A. (2019). Pengaruh Jenis Kandang Terhadap Infestasi Menopongallinae Pada Ayam Petelur (Gallus gallus) Di Desa Krawang Sari Kecamatan Natar Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. In Skripsi. Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Xu, D., Shu, G., Liu, Y., Qin, P., Zheng, Y., Tian, Y., Zhao, X., & Du, X. (2022). Farm Environmental Enrichments Improve the Welfare of Layer Chicks and Pullets: A Comprehensive Review. In Animals (Vol. 12, Issue 19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192610
Yennie, E., & Elystia, S. (2013). PEMBUATAN PESTISIDA ORGANIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE EKSTRAKSI DARI SAMPAH DAUN PEPAYA DAN UMBI BAWANG PUTIH. Jurnal Dampak, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25077/dampak.10.1.46-59.2013
Yilmaz Dikmen, B., Dpek, A., Şahan, U., Petek, M., & Sözcü, A. (2016). Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Science, 95(7), 1564–1572. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew082
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Agriprecision & Social Impact
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.